File security settings don’t translate as-is to L-NAS.Total file name lengths are limited in some L-NAS.NTFS allows names to reach over 32,000 characters, while many other file systems do not. File name lengths are limited differently.
#Synology deduplicator windows#
File size limitations are different from NTFS, commonly used in Windows.Serious network connectivity / stability issues (for example, search for “The specified network name is no longer available” diskstation).L-NAS isn’t an issue per se, but when you primarily use Windows PCs to create and use your files, you will, sooner or later, run into issues with L-NAS devices when copying those files over. When and Why are L-NAS Devices a Problem? Some NAS boxes power off and go into a standby but don’t power back on properly and thereby break idle network connections.DNS issues: It happens under high load and long simultaneous transfers that NAS boxes become inaccessible via their DNS or network name.Network links break randomly under high load during transmission.We don’t want to mention the brand name here but from our customers’ experience we know most L-NAS use similar embedded OS code, so many NAS boxes suffer from the same or similar issues. This has been confirmed by our customers contacting their NAS technical support. Several L-NAS types appear to fail under high load.Their FTP servers are partially incompatible with standard FTP protocols.L-NAS are at times buggy and pose a security risk however, a Windows NAS, especially one that isn’t properly updated via Windows Update, may also be buggy and pose a security risk.Ie., each device may suffer from a subset of the issues presented below. There are many different OS variants and hence there is a lack of standardization to be expected.The limitations and issues found in one manufacturer’s device may not necessarily be a OS issue but rather an implementation specific issue within the device. Because they are based on another OS instead of Windows, there are different OS limitations on each side one needs to deal with.When you move data from NTFS to a another file system there is a potential for issues to arise. They usually don’t use NTFS internally.L-NAS devices appear to have several things in common: If you plan to back up a heavy-weight Windows file server or Hyper-V virtual machines to a NAS backup device, it’s best to opt for a device that offers 100% NTFS compatibility. In addition, L-NAS devices suffer from various reliability issues (listed below) that make them unsuitable for large file and folder structures and large file backups. Unfortunately NAS devices don’t provide “plug-and-play” storage functionality because different operating systems are being used and they are only partially compatible with Windows.
While L-NAS devices are great for many implementations, the interplay between Windows and L-NAS and specifically their different file systems impose limitations that are important to know when planning to use a NAS device for backup purposes. We have thousands of customers using the above NAS devices with our server backup software, and there are times when users purchase an underpowered NAS device without being aware of it. In an attempt to help our customers make the right choice when buying a NAS device for backup purposes. If you are planning to use your NAS device for Hyper-V or for backups, please read this article first before diving into further details.Īt BackupChain we have put together this article to describe some of the shortcomings of specific Network Attached Storage devices, such as:ĭrobo, Buffalo, Synology, Netgear, QNap, IOmega, IOSafe, Diskstation, ReadyNAS, let’s collectively call them L-NAS,
0 kommentar(er)
